F.4:3 - Forces · fpf.tools

Force	Tension
Recognition versus ontology	A description must be easy to read but cannot replace the kind, classification judgment, assignment, capability, Method, or Work occurrence.
Kind continuity versus local reuse	The candidate domain, operative membership distinction, member/non-member boundary, and continuity rule decide whether one kind continues. A practice or source change only tells the reader where to compare definitions; a later use may still need a C.3.3 relation between distinct kinds or an F.9 relation between distinct F.17 local-sense cells.
Compactness versus completeness	A useful description is small, but a stronger receiving claim may need state, capability, Method, assignment, evidence, or status checks.
Open-world use versus form burden	Some uses need only a recognition paragraph; stronger uses need explicit neighboring references without pretending every possible relation is current.
Work-facing classification versus episteme use	An admitted system may satisfy a system-role kind and participate in an assignment. An episteme is instead used through evidence, source, publication, requirement, explanation, assurance, or status relations.