F.5:5.1 - Public or Cross-Local Kind Name

A Concept-Set row compares SOSA Observation, metrology measurement result, ML practice metric reading, and a dashboard value exported for comparison. The row is a comparison and evidence surface, not admission or identity of a common result value.

Keep the concrete objects at their direct loci. Pump 14 was measured before the reading was recorded, but this naming example does not identify a dated Work occurrence. If a use needs that occurrence, recover its exact actual performer through A.13 and admit it independently under A.15.1. Attribute it under F.6 only when that use also consumes precise assignment-bound attribution.

C.16 constitutes the measurement result: a value attributed to the measurand together with the Characteristic, Scale, uncertainty, method, model, calibration basis, time stance, and measurement Work needed to interpret it. Pump14PressureReading_2026-07-14T10-42Z is one C.2.1 episteme that states that result; F.5 does not repeat either pattern’s schema. The result and its episteme are distinct from raw output, indication, Pump 14’s actual state, a later diagnosis, a criterion verdict, evidence, or a dashboard display. Pump14CalibrationTrace_2026-07-14 is a provenance record. G.6 and A.10 make its calibration and source path recoverable by representing independently established direct relations. A dashboard publication may cite the reading, and the Concept-Set row may cite the reading and trace; neither is the result, its episteme, provenance, or a generic relation that establishes them.

Only E.24.UK or the direct result pattern can admit a shared value and its invariants. After admission, use F.5 to select Reading, Result, or another neutral head no wider than that value. The spelling still creates no result or provenance identity.