F.5:5.3 - Evidence Use Is Not a System-Role Name

Source text may say ModelFitEvidenceRole. The repair is not a prettier role label. This naming example does not identify the model-fit evaluation as a dated Work occurrence. Recover the exact objects it does consume: ModelFitResult_2026-07-15T09-22Z is a separately constituted domain-local result episteme; ModelFitTargetClaim-v5 is the target claim; and ModelFitRunTrace_2026-07-15 is the provenance record; G.6 and A.10 represent its independently established source and provenance relations in a descriptive path. Keep any operation-result binding, result-episteme inception claim, evidence use, provenance, and current assurance claim separate, and apply the rule that defines or tests each relation.

A durable name, if needed, names one recovered evidence-use relation, status value, Work occurrence, result episteme, or provenance value. ModelFitEvidenceRole, a NameCard, row, or citation creates none of them and supplies no generic evidence-result relation. It is neither a local system-role kind nor a SystemRoleKindDescription label.