| Assignment proves Work | Holding is confused with dated performance. | Name the Work and assignment, then establish from the case that the Work was performed under that assignment. |
| Holder plus interval constructs attribution | Any covering assignment held by the performer is treated as the assignment under which W occurred. | Treat the matching holder and interval coverage as necessary checks; establish from the case which assignment the Work was performed under. |
| Overlap attributes to every commission | Two assignments with a common holder and interval both receive the same Work. | Recover all participants; establish only the Work–assignment link supported by the case, or leave it unresolved. |
| Lead or team assignment covers everyone | One assignment substitutes for the actual performer set. | Recover every exact actual performer of top-level or child Work through A.13 and let A.15.1 independently admit each Work occurrence. When precise assignment-bound attribution is current, give each performer its own same A.13 assignment and later F.6 link to the already admitted Work; missing attribution leaves Work intact. |
| Passive article becomes performer | A test-subject assignment and overlap are read as Work attribution or passive participation. | Attribute Work only to actual performers; use the rule that defines passive participation or return the A.6.RCD missing-governor result. |
| Work attributed by a system-role label | The holder and assignment occurrence are unavailable. | Recover the declared assignment occurrence, all its participants, and its holder. |
| F.6 creates a generic assignment | A stronger appointment is flattened or duplicated. | Keep RA’s declared species and let SystemRoleAssignmentSlot consume the family. |
| Non-covering assignment | Work lies outside RA’s predicate-true episode. | Use the covering assignment only when the case also links it to the Work; otherwise leave attribution unresolved. |
RoleEnactmentFact retained | A duplicate object competes with Work and attribution. | Replace it with the F.6 relation between the Work and assignment. |
| Assertion or evidence creates the pair | A report or support path is treated as what makes the Work–assignment fact true. | Keep the assertion and evidence in their own relations; use them only to support reliance on the attribution claim. |
| Report as performer | A result or evidence episteme fills holder position. | Keep the report in its result, evidence, source, or publication relation. |
| Context shorthand becomes ontology | Context is inserted as a universal participant. | Recover the denoted object and the relation that actually applies. |