fpf.tools
Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading
Source · lines 106585–106595

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 05:29:54 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 05:30:57 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 06:25:20 UTC

F.6:3 - Forces

ForceTension
Readability vs exact identityOrdinary prose should stay short, while reliance-bearing use may need exact Work and assignment occurrences.
Attribution-facing holder projection vs actual-performer recoveryF.6 may expose the assignment holder for an exact equality check, while A.13 and A.15.1 have already recovered the actual performer independently. The projection must preserve every additional assignment participant.
Assignment vs performanceAn exact assignment can be a participant in Work attribution; its existence, holder, and temporal coverage neither make the Work happen nor establish the attribution relation.
World-side obtaining vs knowledgeMissing support makes reliance unresolved, not Work unperformed.
Local interpretation vs cross-context reuseSimilar names or Bridges do not retarget Work to another assignment.
Thin attribution vs neighboring checksCapability, state, Method, result, acceptance, and evidence can matter without becoming attribution participants.