F.8:11 - Rationale

A naming mistake is often a subject or use mistake. Asking “what name should we use?” too early lets wording decide ontology, scope, or authority. F.8 therefore recovers the subject and proposed use before selecting a naming treatment.

F.8 is narrower than F.18. It decides whether the expression stays local, reuses something available, or opens one stronger naming path. F.18 runs a durable settlement, candidate comparison, NameCard, lineage, and any later public-row gate. F.8 creates neither the governed value nor the objects produced by the stronger path.

The system-role branch shows why the ordering matters. A designation L, local system-role kind K, optional F.4 description D, and any assignment A are different objects. The word role can also point to another governed subject. Recovering that subject first keeps naming from creating a false kind or assignment.

The accountable branch follows the same rule. A decision occurrence, C.2.1 result episteme about it, C.11 result, decision-making Work, and rendered record answer different questions. Section 4.5 opens only when a receiving claim needs that stronger traceability; ordinary F.8 use stops earlier.