F.8:7.6 - Readable Disposition and Explicit Stops

The ReviewerRole case closes with one readable result. The recovered kind is a local U.Kind for U.System candidates, distinguished by its stable review contribution and tested by its KindSignature; any assignment remains separate. The result is:

Under PatternReviewReferenceScheme-2026, use ReviewerRole as the Plain designation of ReviewerSystemRole for local review-method prose. No existing designation or alias supports that use, so select openDurableNamingSettlement: A.2 and C.3 continue to govern the kind, F.5 governs its designation, and F.18 supplies the durable settlement. Reopen it if the proposed use becomes evidential, status-bearing, access-related, source-facing, published, or cross-local, or if another change of use or audience exceeds this local settlement’s scope.

That sentence is the F.8 result. It needs no decision occurrence or result episteme. If a later claim must cite, replay, or assign accountability to the decision, use §4.5. No naming-decision governor is available in this case, so that branch returns missing-governor rather than inventing ReviewerSystemRoleNamingDecision-2026-07-31. C.11 applies only to a genuine local choice among available options. For any precise decision-making Work, A.13 first recovers the exact actual performer and A.15.1 independently admits the dated Work; F.6 follows only when the later claim expressly consumes precise assignment-bound attribution through the same obtaining A.13 assignment.

EvidenceRole stops earlier and does not enter F.8. The known subject is ReviewReport-82 : U.Episteme, proposed for evidence use concerning an adequacy claim. Still missing are the target claim and polarity, the evidence-use relation and relation kind, the provenance and any assurance or reliance use and validity window, and one subject pattern that defines the relation. Apply that pattern and keep the wording local until those facts are recovered. PatternReviewReferenceScheme-2026 may interpret the source wording, but the review label creates no evidence relation, system-role kind, description, assignment, authority, or publication. No SchemeSenseCell, LocalSenseBasisRelation, or selected Structure is needed merely to record this stop.

Re-enter F.8 only after one governed relation, its kind, its subject pattern, and the proposed naming use are available. If the target claim, polarity, provenance, assurance or reliance use, or validity window changes, reopen the subject claim rather than the name.