Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 02:22:15 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 03:38:22 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 04:40:20 UTC

F.8:8 - Conformance Checklist

CheckPass condition
CC-F8-01The expression, governed value or relation, subject pattern, and proposed use are named before the disposition.
CC-F8-02An expression that covers several governed subjects or uses is split; for example, a kind, assignment, evidence use, policy, Method, or Work is not handled as one naming case.
CC-F8-03The naming ReferenceScheme and local-sense claim are stated. A cell, basis relation, or selected Structure appears only when the naming use needs that object.
CC-F8-04Local phrase, existing designation, alias, subject-pattern name, and admitted F.17 row were tried before a stronger naming object.
CC-F8-05Reuse preserves kind, scope, occurrence identity, local-sense claim, admitted use, authority, and lineage.
CC-F8-06A system-role-kind designation follows A.2 and C.3 recovery of the kind and does not require an F.4 description. If the description is separately needed, its label remains distinct from the kind designation.
CC-F8-07Classification and assignment remain under C.3 and A.2.1. Any precise performed Work begins with the exact actual performer recovered through A.13 and independent A.15.1 admission; F.6 appears only for an expressly consumed precise assignment-bound attribution through the same obtaining A.13 assignment. None is inferred from a name.
CC-F8-08Any other governed subject—for example, a status, evidence use, access value, policy, publication use, or relation position—returns to its subject pattern before naming.
CC-F8-09F.17 row reuse stays within AdmissibleUse; spelling or local-sense reuse implies neither an F.9 Bridge nor equivalence.
CC-F8-10Ordinary use creates no decision object. The accountable branch resolves the decision or choice occurrence through the pattern that admits it or returns missing-governor, while any C.11 result, Work, result episteme, record, and naming object stays separate.
CC-F8-11A locality label such as PatternReview_2026 is interpreted as the Work, plan, claim content, ReferenceScheme, or other object actually present; the label creates none of them.
CC-F8-12An unsettled U-kind proposal receives only blockOrLowerUse and the needed E.24.CD or E.24.UK route. Naming reopens only for the object identified by a stable admission result.
CC-F8-13A policy identifier resolves its specification and scope. When its mint history is cited, replayed, normative, cross-local, or accountable, the occurrence basis required by §8.1 is also recoverable; otherwise that stronger claim returns missing-governor.
CC-F8-14The result states the governed subject, selected disposition, admitted naming use, and smallest change that reopens the decision. Any non-use boundary passes F.19’s grounded-contribution test.