F.9.1:5.2 - Operational reading of a control cue

An F.9 Partial-overlap Bridge obtains between one exact operator-alarm sense and one broader control-cue sense. A separate affirmative bounded-use claim says that this Bridge is suitable for using the alarm term in one training explanation, in the alarm-to-control direction, under a rule that preserves the response trigger but not the complete control model, with zero tolerance for treating the term as implementation authority. A current A.10 reliance judgment says the available evidence supports relying on that narrow claim.

A stance note may now say: “For this training explanation, read the alarm term as operationalizing the response-trigger part of the control cue; do not read it as the complete control model or as permission to change the controller.” The stance is operationalizes. Whether an instructor is authorized to use that wording and whether any training Work actually uses it remain separate. No Card is required; a Card may package the already separate objects if durable reuse pays.