Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 11:52:20 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 11:53:41 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 13:15:03 UTC

F.9.1:9 - Rationale

The stance vocabulary is useful because practitioners already write short interpretive glosses. The ontology stays small by treating each gloss as ordinary claim-bearing content rather than a new relation kind or universal classification. Making the bounded-use claim the EntityOfConcern also keeps a Card as optional publication packaging rather than the subject or source of the relation and use claims. One primary stance per claim is a readability default, not a new cardinality law. The real criterion is whether the note makes the claim easier to understand without hiding a materially different reading; when one ordinary sentence does that better, the sentence wins.