F.9:20 - Bias-Annotation

Lenses tested: governance, architecture, ontology and episteme, pragmatics, didactics. Scope: universal for cross-context correspondence and reuse.

• Governance bias. The pattern adds a separate use claim and reliance check. Mitigation: keep them in ordinary sentences when durable packaging has no payoff.
• Architecture bias. Typed relation profiles can look heavier than synonym prose. Mitigation: the five-part script begins with the practical action and introduces exact terms only where they stop a real overread.
• Ontology and episteme bias. F.9 resists global meaning claims and keeps claims separate from their subject. Mitigation: explicit Bridges still permit practical cross-context comparison.
• Pragmatic bias. Conservative separation can feel slower than reusing a mapping table. Mitigation: a fixed Bridge can support many independently stated uses without being reidentified.
• Didactic bias. The four-object split can become bureaucratic if written only in internal nouns. Mitigation: every use starts by saying what a person will do, what rule they will follow, and what result would make them stop.