Source changed 2026-10-03 05:29:54 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 05:30:57 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 07:35:20 UTC
F.9:3 - Forces
Force
Tension to resolve
Locality versus reuse
Senses are context-local, yet people need common labels and comparison points across contexts.
Simplicity versus fidelity
Few Bridge kinds are teachable; too few hide material semantic differences.
Relation truth versus practical use
A correspondence can obtain while a proposed direction, rule, or tolerance is unsuitable.
senseFamily continuity versus explanation
Some relations compare senses within one family; others explain a cross-family connection without making them substitutable.
Evidence versus authorization
Evidence or assurance may support reliance on a bounded-use claim but does not grant legal, policy, or deontic permission.
Bridge discipline versus subject patterns
F.9 defines how to state semantic correspondence; using it must not create local system-role kinds or assignments, work, evidence relations, publications, or status occurrences.