Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 08:25:59 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 08:26:43 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 10:05:06 UTC

OPTION-COMPARISON — Keep unlike option results distinct

  • Situation: Labels such as build, buy, reuse, provider, internal, outsource or AI need comparison; uncertainty blocks costly commitment; or advice demands costly or infeasible work.
  • Question: Form complete ways, compare or retain candidates, govern a pool, prepare options for another chooser, choose now, or repair an evidence demand?
  • First useful result or blocker: A complete-enough same-result way set, comparison or retained set, pool rule, prepared OptionSet, ChoiceResult, usable advice, answer to the blocking question or exact gap.
  • Mantra: Name one result, use, situation, horizon, and acceptance basis. Turn labels into complete ways on one parity basis, keeping supported, proposed, and unknown premises visible. Compare or choose only when current; preserve worthwhile variants and gaps. For costly action, resolve only the uncertainty blocking commitment. Return when the result, basis, evidence, or use changes.
  • Start with: C.11.DUA for a demand’s contribution or feasibility; C.38 for incomplete ways; otherwise A.19.ECS, C.18, C.19, G.5 or C.11 for the current question. For costly commitment, select the current check in A.10, B.3, A.20, A.21, C.28, C.11 or A.15.5.
  • Stop or return: Stop at the present question’s result. Option descriptions establish neither choice nor capability, authority, Work, provision, delivery, acceptance or use.