G.2:2 - Problem
How can we systematically assemble a SoTA view that is:
- pluralist but comparable (plurality preserved; comparability is achieved only via explicit crossings),
- evidence‑addressable (claims cite auditable evidence surfaces and anchors),
- actionable (produces inventories and citable publication forms usable in G.3, G.4, and G.5 without treating a card as a meaning container or selector authority),
- refreshable (editions/policies/windows are pinned so RSCR/refresh can re‑audit and re‑run without semantic drift)?