fpf.tools
Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading
Source · lines 115555–115562

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 11:52:20 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 11:53:41 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 12:15:10 UTC

G.4:3 - Forces

  • Expressiveness vs legality. CAL must allow useful comparisons/aggregations while staying lawful under CHR typing and legality gates.
  • Pluralism vs comparability. Multiple method traditions must coexist without forcing premature unification, yet remain cross‑citable and auditable.
  • Decision support vs auditability. CAL must support selection and selected-set formation while preserving explicit, reviewable assumptions and proofs.
  • Exploration vs assurance. CAL must support exploratory regimes (probing, novelty, open‑ended search) without letting un‑assured outputs silently become dominance claims.
  • Locality vs portability. Each CAL clause stays bounded by its declared ClaimScope, window, source meanings, and ReferencePlane; reuse beyond that boundary requires the exact relation and crossing records that the changed value calls for.