G.5:0.6 - Reuse a local grouping, then register it publicly when needed

The pump team in §0.5 already dispatches through R3 and R2. That unordered shortlist requires no new row. If the grouping of both Methods must recur across triage runs, the team can define:

MethodFamilyRowRef = <PumpReviewCandidates-local, R1>
MethodRef[] = [ThresholdTrendReviewMethod-E2, SpectralResidualReviewMethod-E1]
GroupingBasis = PumpTriageCandidateGrouping-E1
EligibilityBasis = PumpTriageEligibility-E1
TaskSignatureRef = PumpVibrationTriage-T1
ComparisonBasis = no admitted ordering; retain admissible alternatives unordered

The grouping criterion is “these admitted review Methods are candidates for pump vibration triage using the stated 24-hour input and 30-minute budget.” This project-local row fixes those exact members and basis; changed membership or an action-changing policy makes R2. It requires neither a UTS row nor an AssuranceProfile when this ordinary use has no assurance gate. A later real gate still consumes its required evidence and follows its unknown/fail behavior.

If the team instead intends a stable public registry entry, its proposed public continuation can be <PumpReviewCandidates, P1>, linked by an explicit naming/continuity mapping to the local R1 grouping. P1 retains the same exact Method refs and grouping criterion, adds the typed EligibilityStandardRef for the pump task and an AssuranceProfileRef stating expectations for its declared uses, and satisfies UTS naming/publication requirements under S1 and CC-G5.6. Registration is complete only when those public-contract obligations are met. For this P1 example, PumpTriageEligibilityStandard-E1 states the two Methods’ required 24-hour series and 30-minute budget, with unknown when a required input cannot be determined. PumpTriageAssuranceProfile-E1 names the evidence expectations and failure behavior for the declared triage uses; UTS-PumpReviewCandidates-P1 supplies the public name and continuity mapping to R1. P1 registration consumes these completed declarations and that UTS entry alongside the unchanged exact member/grouping basis. A missing one leaves public registration incomplete. The assurance profile supplies no B.3 result.

R1 itself completes through RegisterFamily with the six values shown above: neither AuthoringBase nor AuthoringMinimal is activated because this local grouping has no CG-Frame use. P1 adds the three public references just described and activates UTSWhenPublicIdsMinted. Now suppose a later G.5-3 Select use is governed by PumpTriage-CG-E1, whose MinimalEvidence clause requires a valid sensor calibration for the cited vibration series. Its CN/CG editions and frame pins are required. If the calibration input is missing, the evidence predicate is unknown and this example’s gate rule returns abstain; neither successful local R1 registration nor completed public P1 registration makes that selection pass.

Making local R1 available to the project audience may itself be an E.24.PUB publication occurrence when that pattern’s conditions obtain. Conversely, the intention or declaration of P1 establishes no availability. Neither branch creates a Method or an ontic family relation. Non-Method joint-use members continue through DeclareSetResult with their existing identities and inclusion basis.