Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 08:25:59 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 08:26:43 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 09:50:10 UTC

G.6:7 - Conformance Checklist

IDCheckRepair if missing
CC-G6-01 Exact useIs one relied-on claim or bounded downstream use named?Name it, or stay in local A.10 source recovery.
CC-G6-02 Object projectionDoes every node cite an exact independently governed object, kind, governor, qualification, and representation ref?Recover the object or record an unresolved gap; do not mint a graph-only world object.
CC-G6-03 Relation prerequisiteDoes every asserted edge cite one exact direct relation, its actual participants, governor, obtaining claim, and context?Establish the direct relation first or remove the edge from the relied-on path.
CC-G6-04 No fallback edgeAre legacy or display labels prevented from acting as universal relations?Replace each with the exact formal, measurement, work, production, publication, representation, provenance, temporal, status-use, or later-use relation.
CC-G6-05 Work boundaryDoes each represented Work cite one independently admitted A.15.1 Work ref and its A.13-qualified actual performer refs? Are assignment occurrence and F.6 refs included only when the path expressly consumes precise assignment-bound attribution, with a missing attribution recorded as a gap rather than loss of the Work node? Are Method, MethodDescription, resources, direct participation, and A.6.1 bindings still separate?Use A.13 and A.15.1 for the already-established performer and Work. Cite A.2.1/F.6 only for an expressly consumed attribution, A.6.1 for actual operation bindings, and the exact direct relation for every other participant claim.
CC-G6-06 Result boundaryAre produced entity, subject result, result episteme, carrier, outcome, assurance, and later action distinct and independently identified under exact predicates?Handle each through the exact predicates and assertions located in A.15.PROD, the domain result pattern, C.2.1, E.17/E.24.PUB/C.29, B.3, or the later-action source.
CC-G6-07 Source and representationAre source publication, carrier, copy/transform chain, and C.29 correspondence explicit when current?Recover those relations before treating the graph rendering as source truth.
CC-G6-08 Time and crossingAre bounded context, plane, window, bridge/loss, edition, policy, source order, and G.11 currentness visible where they limit use?Add the exact refs or narrow/block the path slice.
CC-G6-09 Provenance and useAre A.2.4/A.10 evidence/status use, A.10 provenance/reliance, downstream work, and exact use relation separate?Recover the direct use; path citation or membership is not actual reliance.
CC-G6-10 Ledger boundaryDoes the ledger merely index already established objects and relations, with NotCarried, gaps, and local reopen triggers?Remove process status, generic result fields, and fact-creating language.