G.7:2 - Problem

1. Cross‑Tradition comparisons are frequently attempted via informal “synonymy” or ad‑hoc mappings, causing silent meaning drift and hidden crossings.
2. Plane mismatches (world ↔ concept ↔ episteme, or other ReferencePlane shifts) are often ignored, or conflated with “semantic sameness”, causing wrong downstream confidence.
3. Calibration changes (CL/CL^k/plane or their policy pins) must trigger targeted re‑checks; pack‑wide reweaves are too costly and too slow.
4. If bridges are involved in QD/illumination or other edition‑sensitive telemetry, edition pins must be tracked (otherwise comparisons become irreproducible after a map/distance/policy update).
5. Row‑level summaries (for matrix rows / comparable construct groups) tend to be averaged or “smoothed”, which is incompatible with bottleneck semantics and loss honesty.