G.9:4.3b — Conditional causal method rung parity
Use this extension only when a parity report compares causal methods or causal-use claims. Start with a cheap screen and stop at degraded parity or abstention when the methods answer different questions.
CausalRungParityScreen:
comparedMethodsRef
targetCausalityLadderRungSet
causalSupportComponentTypeSet
sameEstimand: yes | no | unclear
sameOutcomeWindow: yes | no | unclear
sameTransportEndpoints: yes | no | unclear
cheapParityStop:
comparableEnoughForFullRecord |
crossRungDegrade |
crossSupportComponentsDegrade |
differentEstimandAbstain |
differentOutcomeWindowAbstain |
differentEndpointsAbstain |
returnToC28
causalSupportComponentTypeSet records which methods rely on evidence paths/data regimes, identification, estimates, direct counterfactual sampling, simulation, or transport. Difference is not an automatic ban, but it must be exposed and bridged; one label cannot make unlike components equivalent.
Open the full record only when comparison remains meaningful:
CausalMethodRungParityRecord:
comparedMethodsRef
causalUseQuestionRef?: CausalUseQuestionRef
targetCausalUseClaimKind: CausalUseClaimKind
targetCausalityLadderRung: CausalityLadderRung
causalEstimandRef: CausalEstimandRef
declaredCausalityLadderBridgeOrLossRef?
interventionBudgetOrActionSetRef?
causalSupportComponentRefs: CausalSupportComponentRefs
declaredCausalSupportLossRef?
causalUseSupportResultRef?: CausalUseSupportResultRef
causalFollowUpWindowRef
outcomeMeasureRef
sourcePopulationRef?
targetPopulationRef?
sourceDomainRef?
targetDomainRef?
sourceEnvironmentRef?
targetEnvironmentRef?
sourceDataGeneratingRegimeRef?
targetDataGeneratingRegimeRef?
transportabilityResultRef?
estimateResultRef?
parityVerdict: parityEstablished | degraded | abstain
supportedParityUse
unsupportedParityUse
The record names every changed transport endpoint that matters; population and semantic scheme do not substitute for domain, environment, or data-generating regime. Different rungs, estimands, windows, endpoints, or support components require a bridge/loss, degraded parity, or abstention. G.9 makes the parity conclusion; C.28 supplies the cited causal-support result and does not authorize the benchmark conclusion.