GOALS.Reference:5.3 - Revise the relation that changed

Before week 2 execution, the payment interface changes. The technical owner establishes that all ten repair hours are now needed before the payment batch can run. Repair has become an enabling prerequisite for the committed result. The old 12 + 8 + 4 arrangement no longer works even though its sum still fits.

The holders of the affected contributions agree 10 repair hours first, 12 payment hours next and 2 learning hours in week 2. The specialist confirms that this order fits the batch window. In week 3, the now-unneeded two repair hours join the previously booked six learning hours: 8 for learning and the same 2 for exceptions. Both weeks fit their actual provision. The learning provider uses the two-hour episode for initial case framing with feedback and the booked eight hours for varied cases and assessment; this sequence can still meet the learning deadline. The improvement forecast is reconsidered using the completed repair’s actual scope. If the original four learning hours had an immovable week-2 obligation, the changed set would require 26 hours; two hours of qualified substitute provision or an effective change of that obligation would still be needed.

The decision is made when the interface change is discovered, through the people who can change the affected work. The routine weekly service conversation then uses the revised arrangement.