Jump to text
On this page
Copy and source
Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-14 19:58:00 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-14 19:58:38 UTC · last check 2026-10-15 00:55:16 UTC

IS.2:4.5 - Make the returned contribution usable in the next episode

Inspect the returned result against the question that required it. A repaired access claim needs an actually usable route. An explanation needs to settle the disputed interpretation or preserve the exact unresolved question. An agreed allocation needs to be effective when the work occurs.

Arrange the receiving action. Place the corrected reference at the point of use, obtain the permitted next case, connect the expert response to the decision or make the protected interval available. IS.3 constructs a larger strategy only when several contributions or alternatives still require it.

Observe the next use only as far as it can change the response or the claimed result. Keep failed entry, missing observation and justified non-use distinct. If the response did not supply its promised contribution, repair that connection or return it to the provider. If it did supply the contribution but the larger result still failed, continue from the next consequential difficulty.