IS.3:4.3 - Explain why each contribution could help

Connect the intended benefit to the action that could obtain it and the conditions on which it depends. A rehearsal may help a person recognize a stop condition; an expert inspecting the final result may instead supply recognition directly. Both can improve the immediate result, but only one is intended to develop the person’s own operation.

Ask what should be observable if the contribution is delivered and useful. Ask what would differ if it is unavailable, not performed, misunderstood or inappropriate to this context. Keep that explanation modest when its causal basis is uncertain. Existing professional knowledge can justify a bounded attempt without supplying a causal effect estimate.

Use A.3.1.MI:4.5 when the proposed adaptation requires the fuller delivery–mechanism–context comparison. That Method connects rival explanations, attainable inquiry and return to the affected result. Do not create a separate obligatory evaluation programme here.

Distinguish the support strategy from the target. Changing the time of a briefing or the availability of help can leave the target unchanged. Replacing its decision criterion, accepting a different input interpretation or removing a decisive comparison can change it. Preserve the proposed function and the evidence for its actual fulfillment separately; unchanged intended function does not prove unchanged Method identity.