| Select “training” or “facilitation” as though the name explains the intervention. | Describe the actual operation, expected contribution and conditions. |
| Make a local adaptation by deleting the difficult target step. | Obtain a qualified variant or repair the missing means. |
| Count shared preparation once but omit recurring local support. | Follow each actual receiving use and count its demand. |
| Compare expert execution with learning as equivalent outputs. | Preserve the different result and ask the legitimate recipient to choose. |
| Promise the same scarce hour to incompatible service and coaching demands, or count one joint contribution twice. | Obtain a feasible allocation. Where one joint review serves both uses, count its time once and qualify each result separately; retain the additional preparation, recipient and instructional effort. |
| Use a workflow configuration as proof that the Method is enacted. | Inspect the actual performance and its operative conditions through A.3.1.MI. |