KCAE.Application:1.4 - Assessment changes the next operation
The first candidate pool contains the current resend section, old localization, compatibility table and faster-worker guidance. Read them against the receiving result. The faster-worker paragraph concerns completion delay, which this episode does not establish. It can remain a rival question if actual latency evidence appears, but it does not explain duplicate removal merely because the customer mentioned workers.
The table and procedure reveal a missing case fact. The first returned result is therefore: “The automatic route depends on the destination protocol and stable batch identity. Obtain the authorized configuration report; do not infer those values from the successful export.” This result is useful because it specifies which fact changes the action and how it can be obtained.
Two continuations make the distinction inspectable:
| Configuration result | Assessment | Useful next result |
|---|---|---|
| Protocol v1 | The automatic resend condition is contradicted. A receipt count alone cannot identify missing exports. | Obtain the identity-bearing report and prepare supervised reconciliation under the alternative method. |
| Protocol v2, stable batch identity, accepted-ID receipts available | The named automated prerequisites are supported under rev. 7. | Construct the receipt comparison, verify remaining conditions and propose the bounded resend arrangement. |
| Protocol not obtainable | The decisive basis remains missing. | Give the dependency and access limitation; retain the manual or authorized inquiry alternatives without asserting automated applicability. |
A typed assessor can cheaply screen source-condition questions. The source-reading and case-fact operations remain explicit. A high group-choice probability for the resend section does not decide any of these three branches.