KCAE.EVAL:5 - Archetypal Grounding

Suppose CedarBench compares an existing hybrid search workflow with a proposed direct-block supplement on 40 withheld support episodes. These are invented study conditions, not reported measurements. Cases include protocol ambiguity, old translations, useful table notes and naturally unsupported requests. Both alternatives use the same source snapshot, assessor, delivery and recipient rules. The proposed route adds its actual call and maintenance costs.

If a missed exception appears after manually supplying its source, the original finding route was a limitation. If the assessor still recommends resend on protocol v1, retrieval repair alone cannot close the case. If the judgement is correct but the customer receives only the upbeat first sentence, delivery remains defective. The adoption question returns only after the relevant whole is tried again.