KCAE.Profiles:2.3 - Comparative evidence beyond the output type

The 2026 early empirical audit of typed decision models warns that interface specialization and comparison conditions can be confused with intrinsic accuracy gains. Typed decision coherence beyond calibration separates logical consistency among answers from probability calibration. These are bounded, early studies, useful as failure and comparison evidence rather than a final vendor ranking.

Accordingly, compare the actual typed and generative alternatives with matched evidence and required output. Test ranking, adequacy thresholds, calibration and any logical relationships separately. A model that selects the best available option can still need a distinct all-options-inadequate outcome. No scalar combines source authority, completeness, capability and permission into an automatic licence to act.