MDPE.13:3.2 - Describe the current arrangement with several views
Use only the views that can change the decision.
| View | Show | Question answered |
|---|---|---|
| encounter and participation | event or medium, access conditions, invitation, admission, consent, refusal, exit | Who can actually meet or participate in the variant, and who is filtered out first? |
| recognition | variant, recognition task, capable recognizer or sensing System, representations, comparison conditions, uncertainty | Which difference can be distinguished, by whom, and in which Music or Dance situation? |
| selection and authority | decision, chooser, criteria, evidence, authority, permission, affected parties | Who may decide what, and whose judgement or rights constrain that decision? |
| mediation and visibility | venue, schedule, camera, recording, publication, recommendation System, format, metrics | What is amplified, obscured, reordered, or transformed before people respond? |
| feedback and contest | returned observations, rewards, exclusion, performer or teacher adaptation, appeal, revision, refusal, alternate venue | How can the arrangement change later practice, and how can a harmful effect be challenged? |
These are views of one arrangement. A partner can recognize timing while a jury selects a battle result and a camera mediates visibility during the same festival occurrence.
Ground the current arrangement in actual Work and relations. A policy, scoring table, syllabus, event page, model, or platform description is evidence about an arrangement, not the arrangement itself. When a recognition Method, authority, or feedback relation is missing, report that missing result and the design decision it prevents.