| The intended recurrence is visible | “New style” remains a label or trait list. | State what later Agents must be able to perform, recognize, transmit, or recover. |
| Current reproduction is grounded in Work | A diagram starts from abstract cultural nouns. | Trace one representative occurrence backward and forward through actual Methods, capability, Systems, and relations. |
| Architecture concerns are not stages | Generation, training, performance, recognition, and memory become a fictitious lifecycle. | Show which concerns operate together and which first–then relation belongs only to one chosen Method. |
| Several candidates differ materially | The first institutional or technical idea becomes inevitable. | Vary the principal changed relation, not just the wording or tool. |
| The selected change is locally actionable | The project claims it will change “culture”, “the market”, or “the algorithm”. | Name the Agent, System or Method changed; the direct signal, access, contact, participation, observation-use, teaching-use, or selection relation; and the authority to change it. |
| The specified test addresses representative recurrence | Publication or an initial demonstration substitutes for the intended later use. | Specify the changed condition and observation of later enactment, recognition, or recovery required by the claim; a tested-result claim needs the obtained observations. |
| Project action and cultural evolution remain separate | Local authorization or success becomes population selection. | State local Work and effect now; claim wider transmission, recognition, selection, or retention only from later evidence. |