MDPE.8:6 - Sources and Epistemic Boundaries
| Source line | Contribution used here | Boundary |
|---|---|---|
Current FPF E.10.ARCH, C.36.P, A.3.1, A.3.2, A.15.1, C.32.MWA, and C.36 | General wording repair; Method, description and Work distinctions; non-isomorphic practice structures; cultural-evolution discipline. | FPF does not supply the Music-and-Dance entry cues, representative Work, or domain change question. |
| Renata Peçanha interview, Zoukology | One practitioner account connecting music, partner experimentation, movement, teaching, choreography, criticism, and continuity. | It is not independent whole-field history and establishes neither sole origin nor universal recognition or effectiveness. |
| Holly Herndon and Mat Dryhurst, The Call, Serpentine | Distinguishable musical, choir, recording, dataset, model, installation, and participant subjects inside one project. | The project record establishes artifacts and an exhibition, not a general AI-art Method, durable style, or later retention. |
| Georgia Tech Shimon account | A performing robot case that separates bounded autonomous composition/performance from later practice development. | The public account does not establish robot authority over the later project or population-level cultural continuation. |
| Pavel Sobiray, Street Tango Concept | A projective description plus exercises, teaching, and participant reports supporting a bounded authorial practice. | The creator source does not establish independent superiority, sole origin, whole-field recognition, or long-term retention. |
Recheck only a claim whose source or receiving use changed. Popularity, official status, or a newer publication is not enough by itself.