MDPE.Application:5.2.5 - Worked repair

Consider: “Kizomba is easy, but schools must make the dance harder to keep it alive.”

The initial wording leaves the learner, task, form of difficulty and meaning of continuity unstated. In the event case above, the relevant claim can instead be:

“Newcomers can attempt this event’s entry partnering task after the short clinic. The school proposes an optional advanced class to retain participants seeking more demanding work. Check whether the class supplies that challenge and whether its schedule leaves the promised social floor and affordable entry available.”

The repair retains the development proposal. It removes the inference from a general label to an intrinsic difficulty and from greater difficulty to continued participation. It permits the advanced class while making its contribution and complication inspectable. If those case facts are unavailable, keep the statement a proposal requiring them rather than manufacturing them through wording.

R9.3:1 explicitly explains why its teaching avoids bare “танец”: occurrence, style/pattern and broad activity category are easily confused. This is a useful recognition example, not a proof that one replacement word has a fixed meaning everywhere. A work method still needs its action, applicability and result; a cultural label can have another legitimate use.