ME.11:4.4 - Minimal Constructed Trial Replay
The following is a constructed teaching replay, not field evidence. It shows the smallest result that lets later checks reuse the same Work without turning the trial into their conclusion.
M-Unit-Review-1 is admitted for reviewing temperature-sensor calibration reports before release. Its current description tells the reviewer to identify every source unit, normalize values, compare them with the declared tolerance, and stop on an unresolved mismatch. WP-ME11-1 plans two review tasks for the same week. S-Rep-1 is a current same-unit report of the ordinary kind. S-Disc-1 keeps the product, decision, reviewer, description, and support fixed but introduces a Celsius/Kelvin mismatch; it is selected because the live claim is that the Method lets this reviewer expose a unit mismatch before release.
The interpretation relies on CAP-R17-1: holder Reviewer-17; calibration-report-review Work family; temperature-sensor-report envelope; measure “four of four seeded unit cases detected with description edition 4”; current through day D30; qualification record QR-R17-1. The qualification, assignment, permission to inspect the report, and release authority remain different facts. The trial also records description edition 4 and the manually retrieved conversion table as ME.10 support inputs.
Two occurrences then happen and are admitted separately. W-Rep-1 is performed by Reviewer-17 inside Calibration-Team-A from 10:03 to 10:10, enacts M-Unit-Review-1, accepts the same-unit report, and records seven minutes of review burden. W-Disc-1 is performed by the same System in the same containing System from 11:14 to 11:26, enacts the same admitted Method, normalizes the Celsius/Kelvin values before comparison, detects an unresolved mismatch, stops the release decision, and returns the report for correction; it records twelve minutes and one conversion-table lookup. The WorkPlan, two Work occurrences, domain decisions, timing record, and observation account remain separate.
| Later use | Evidence returned | Stop retained |
|---|---|---|
| ME.12 coherence | The two occurrences identify the description edition and the operations actually followed; neither exposed an internal contradiction in this slice. | ME.11 does not conclude that the whole MethodDescription or Method construction is coherent. |
| ME.13 fit or transfer | The matched pair records one changed situation condition and the resulting task observations for one current holder. | One discriminating occurrence establishes no transfer to another holder, domain, tool, or qualification window. |
| ME.14 practical worth | The domain decisions, seven- and twelve-minute burdens, lookup, and stop are available for comparison with named alternatives. | A task pass establishes neither net worth nor causal contribution. |
If W-Disc-1 had not occurred, return missing-performed-work; if its enacted-Method relation or relied-on capability basis were absent, return that missing premise. A favourable plan, simulated trace, or qualification record cannot replace the occurrence.