ME.12:0 - Use This When

Use this pattern when Method construction commitments, a MethodDescription, a selected representation, an enactment-support result, or trial evidence no longer agree well enough for a named use. Begin with the possible contradiction and the decision it blocks: which maintained claim may be wrong, incomplete, stale, or unsupported?

The first useful result is a coherence-finding row. It names the claim being checked, its maintained owner and edition, the comparison basis, the observed agreement or defect, the one result to reconsider, and the stop. A truthful owner-not-recoverable or missing-comparison-basis result is better than declaring the whole Method incoherent.

Here coherence is Plain practice wording for checking whether claims relied on for the declared use agree where they should. It is not a new FPF relation, Method admission, fit result, effectiveness result, or universal consistency proof.

Do not use this pattern to decide whether the Method fits another situation, transfers, is worth keeping, caused a result, or is preferable to alternatives. ME.13 owns fit and transfer; ME.14 owns practical worth. A favourable trial can supply evidence for ME.12 without making its conclusion.