ME.12:4.4 - Minimal Constructed Coherence Replay

Continue the constructed ME.11 trial of admitted M-Unit-Review-1. Construction result CCR-UR-1 states that unit identification and normalization precede tolerance comparison. MethodDescription edition 4 says the same and exposes the unresolved-mismatch stop.

Only one current action is at issue: Reviewer-17 must use the flow representation to guide pre-release unit review. Direct use result C37-UR-Flow-4 therefore takes the C.37 exit rather than opening ME.9. It returns to that Method and description edition, requires unit identification, normalization before tolerance comparison, the comparison branch, and the unresolved-mismatch stop, and uses governed representation result REP-UR-Flow-4.

Exact claim: that representation exposes those operations in order for the named review action. A.2.4 classifies the intended preparation use; A.10 path P-UR-Flow-4 carries the current-edition premise with RelianceDisposition=pass for the review window. Receiving task criterion UR-PreRelease-Guide-4 permits use only while those claims remain exposed. The row omits unrelated support-edition detail, preserves Method, description, representation, and Work status, is select for that action, and returns a missing exposure to the direct representation governor and this use row.

ME.10 supplies the current conversion table used in W-Disc-1.

The trial evidence records that Reviewer-17 normalized the Celsius/Kelvin values before comparison and stopped the release decision. Inspection of REP-UR-Flow-4, however, shows identification followed directly by tolerance comparison; the normalization operation is absent. The finding is not “the Method is incoherent”. The construction claim, description claim, support edition, and observed Work agree within this slice. The contradicted claim is the C37-UR-Flow-4 exposure claim for its exact action; no ME.9 profile exists or is needed for this one-use case.

Return CORR-C37-UR-1: revise governed representation result REP-UR-Flow-4 and its direct use row to expose normalization and the unresolved-mismatch branch, or narrow the row’s action, required claim, and omission account. Preserve M-Unit-Review-1, MethodDescription edition 4, W-Disc-1, its task result, and the conversion-table support result. Recheck the same exposure claim after repair. Do not infer fit or worth from the successful Work occurrence.

If the observed defect were instead…	Owner to reconsider	Result not to change automatically
The admitted construction omitted any normalization requirement while the named problem required one.	The exact ME.7 construction or requirement result.	ME.8 and every affected direct C.37 use row or complete ME.9 profile until their own action claims and dependent cross-use relations are checked against the changed construction.
MethodDescription edition 4 reversed the declared operation order while construction and Work supported the original order.	The exact ME.8 description claim and edition.	Method identity and the Work occurrence.
The retrieved conversion table used a stale scale while construction, description, and representation were correct.	The exact ME.10 edition, retrieval, or named-user task result.	ME.7 construction and every unaffected direct C.37 use row or complete ME.9 profile.
The source cannot show which of those positions is wrong.	`owner-not-recoverable` with the missing comparison basis.	All maintained results until evidence distinguishes them.