ME.14:11 - SoTA-Echoing
| Source | Adopted or adapted contribution | Boundary and practitioner implication |
|---|---|---|
| Cash, Daalhuizen, and Hekkert, method efficacy and effectiveness | Keep practical effect and use conditions separate from internal coherence and one universal Method score. | The source does not make one trial sufficient or supply a universal worth aggregation. |
| Yildirim, Campean, and Uddin, function-modeling evaluation in industry practice | Adopt workplace results, varied applications, reported limitations, later review, and the distinction between direct and indirect contribution as evidence positions. | One automotive OEM, retrospective reports, and SSFD within a broader methodology establish neither isolated causality nor universal superiority. |
| Faludi, Yiu, and Agogino, empirical tests of sustainable-design Methods | Adopt immediate participant-reported component-value observations from three families of separate workshops across activities, companies, and industries as bounded evidence inputs. | The publication supplies no common receiver, feasible current-alternative set, matched alternative Work, or counterfactual basis; company choice, order, participant differences, voluntary selection, unmatched timing, immediate self-report, long-term effects, causality, transfer, and recombination remain limits. Establish the local decision and comparison basis before returning a worth action. |
| Schønheyder and Nordby, design-Method use and evolution in professional practice | Adopt project demands, skill sets, organization, adaptation, and cyclic evolution as possible branch and burden conditions. | One firm supplies no universal repertoire or causal effect. |
Current FPF A.19.CPM, A.19.SelectorMechanism, A.2.2, A.10, and direct governors for Work and relations | Reuse non-totalizing comparison, set-valued selection, capability, evidence, Work, and relation semantics. | ME.14 contributes the Method-specific worth characteristics, five-way action, result-specific follow-up, and bounded cross-product evidence result; it does not redefine the generic kernels. |
Reopen the pattern when a field comparison adds a decision-changing consequence or alternative, when practitioners cannot act without a universal score, when XRI-14 loses its bounded receiving use, or when current FPF comparison and selection semantics change the returned action.