ME.22:4.1 - Fix the comparison question

Name the reader or consuming system, the Method or candidate account, the intended action or decision, and the result and stop the description should let the reader recover. Keep the task facts, relevant source conditions, tools and opportunity to act comparable.

State the content that must survive: the relied-on action claims, relations, applicability, uncertainty, result, stop and source-return information. Then state the representation difference, such as notation, arrangement, salience, navigation or interaction. Do not call a new condition or an unsupported diagram edge a form-only change.

Use A.6.3.RT for a changed representation scheme, or the applicable same-regime wording, narrative or coarsening result. Its preservation and loss answer helps establish the comparison inputs; it does not demonstrate improved performance. If the Method’s reusable semantics also changed, retain the ME.15 identity/variant question and bound the description comparison accordingly.