ME.24:5.1 - A covered topic with a missing stop

This constructed case starts with handbook H, edition 3, §4: “Reuse an earlier review for a display-only change.” Paper L, edition 1, §2, adds the condition that reviewed claims, question and qualification window must still match. The reconciled contribution also requires a new source-dependent recheck to stop if its required argument cannot be recovered.

A candidate language has a “Reuse review” entry and cites H and L, but its body says only “reuse the prior review for display changes”. The destination map marks H §4 and L §2 as covered.

Reconstruction finds the reusable action but not the qualification window or source-return stop. The topic is present; the promised decision is not fully recoverable. Return a description-content correction to the body carrying that answer. The correct narrower conclusion is that the action is recoverable while its conditions are missing, not that the entire language has failed.

After repair, the body states the matching-claim/question/window condition and the local source stop. Repeat the same use: the reader can now distinguish permitted reuse from a recheck lacking its basis. This is a constructed content check, not a measurement of review effectiveness.