Library / Method Engineering Principles Framework
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 02:22:15 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 03:38:22 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 04:30:10 UTC

ME.3:7 - Conformance Checklist

Apply these questions to the criteria being established or appraised and to the present use of the result. Existing relevant context can supply the answer.

  • The criteria name a situation family, receiving Work/result, decision level, scope, window, variations, and exclusions.
  • Required Method contributions are stated before candidate assignment.
  • Every criterion names its actual subject or relation rather than hiding it under “method fit”.
  • Method/account content, MethodDescription, performer capability, responsibility, support/access, covering Work assignment, permission relation, decision-authority relation, performed Work, decision result, culture, and receiving-result claims remain distinct.
  • Capability, assignment, permission, and decision authority imply none of one another; an assignment or authority relation does not prove performed Work or its decision result.
  • Allowable variation and non-negotiable conditions are explicit.
  • When a criterion’s justification is disputed, the recommendation compares its actual protective contribution and burden and distinguishes that judgement from current force and the feasible amendment route.
  • Every burden limit names participant, Work scope, time window, bound, and measurement basis.
  • Every decision-changing row names evidence and satisfied | failed | unknown observations.
  • The result states acceptance-for-next-use, stop, and reopen conditions without selecting or admitting a Method.
  • Individual and combined structure questions are routed to different later results.