ME.7:5 - Archetypal Grounding — C-EC-Release-v2

The EC-417 project proposes C-EC-Release-v2 as a whole for safety-relevant release coordination.

Under A, the team waits for signed supplier evidence before integrating the software. Under B2, it integrates from a versioned provisional edition, reconciles it with signed evidence before safety closure, and assigns most preparation of the changes between the editions to the supplier-configuration role to keep the safety engineer within the peak limit. ME.6 §5.3 gives the timing and capacity comparison. A is selected before integration; recovery R is used when closure fails after early B2 integration.

The proposed account states:

The four participant Methods are identified, but the proposed whole is not. Their co-use and the proposed order do not establish that they are Method parts. The relation sets therefore remain proposed:

• provisional-evidence integration at D-21 and signed-evidence reconciliation at D-8;
• signed evidence and accepted safety result before release authorization;
• supplier preparation responsibility for 1.60 h under B2;
• separate safety and release authority;
• PLM, rig, and provider-access conditions; and
• description correspondences from evidence version through integration bundle and verification result.

For this selected trial, ME.7 returns a prospective candidate account with a WorkPlan covering at most three B2 releases. The whole and relation claims remain proposed.

Before each entry, SafetyReviewer-17 performs W-SafetyEvidenceDecision-17 under ASG-SafetyReview-17 and AUTH-SafetyEvidence-17 to accept or reject the named evidence conditions; ReleaseDecider-17 then performs W-ReleaseDecision-17 under ASG-ReleaseDecision-17 and AUTH-ReleaseDecision-17 to decide branch entry and release, withhold, or next-slot disposition. Neither decision or authority relation substitutes for the other.

In B2, TraceReviewer-17 accepts or rejects each AI trace suggestion used by the release branch under ASG-TraceReview-17 and PERM-TraceAcceptReject-17. APP-ME-01 §5 records the one permission grant and the dated Work W-TraceAcceptReject-17-01 that returns acceptance in the filled case. The separate relation PEX-TraceAcceptReject-17-01 connects that dated Work to the permission it exercised. EV-PEX-TraceAcceptReject-17-01 supplies evidence about this exercise. Each additional used suggestion requires its own dated decision Work and result, confirmation that the permission applies at that time, and its own Work-to-permission exercise relation.

Missing signed evidence after early integration triggers recovery R. In R, preserve the performed-integration record and evidence history. Repeat the evidence comparison and affected verification when evidence arrives by D0 while the existing evidence and reversibility guards still hold. Record whether early integration is retained, rolled back, or repeated, and the added burden. If closure remains unresolved at D0, the release result is withhold/next-slot and this R occurrence ends as a failed B2 trial.

ASG-TraceReview-17 and PERM-TraceAcceptReject-17 also end at D0; continuing safety or release relations extend neither. The trial WorkPlan therefore contains no post-D0 AI suggestion, trace-review Work, assignment, permission, result, or exercise, and claims no other later Work. Unresolved R may motivate later planning, but this case asserts no post-D0 recovery WorkPlan, PlanItem, planned endpoints, qualification/currentness result, readiness, assignment, permission/authority, or later Work.

When later non-AI recovery needs coordination, the project may create a new A.15.2 WorkPlan; A.15.2 itself does not require planning before every otherwise valid later Work. Planned or unplanned Work would still need its separate qualification/currentness, readiness, assignment, permission/authority, and A.15.1 occurrence as applicable. These stops preserve all earlier Work and evidence history. A is only a pre-entry alternative.

Acceptance observations include whether each trial respects confidentiality and authority, remains below the D-8 capacity bound, preserves evidence/version correspondence, and reaches a truthful release or recovery result by D0. An attempted post-D0 AI-supported continuation, or an assertion of later Work without a separately admitted A.15.1 dated Work occurrence, is an explicit stop and failed trial observation. The withhold/next-slot result preserves earlier Work and may motivate planning; it creates neither a recovery WorkPlan nor later Work. Those observations may support, narrow, split, or reject the account. They do not by themselves identify the whole; A.3.1 remains the identity owner.

ME.7:5.1 - Finish a Design Comparison Before a Trial Is Available

Suppose an earlier design use asks whether this release-coordination proposal preserves signed-before-closure, confidentiality and the A/B2/R distinctions well enough to compare with another proposal. The current sources support that account, but whole identity and composition relations remain unresolved, and the team has no rig access, allocated effort or trial window. Return the traceable prospective account with those identity and relation limits. The receiving designer can compare the proposals and finish that question on the available content.

A later opportunity with useful obtainable observations can warrant implementation or a trial and its coordination plan. The already selected three-release case above retains its WorkPlan, observations and stops.