ME.9:4.1 - Pattern-Use Unfolding

1. Name one Method-related use. State the receiving System, exact Method Engineering decision or enactment-support action, situation, qualification window, and stop. Another action starts another C.37 invocation even when the user, carrier, or Method is unchanged.
2. Fix the Method subject and source account. Name the admitted Method or candidate status and the current MethodDescription or candidate-account edition. Use ME.8 when the needed Method claims are absent or not current enough.
3. Recover the claims needed by the action. Select only the needed purpose, input/result, performer, capability, tool or resource, action or Work specification, variation point, guard, evidence, authority, support, feedback, or stop claims. Keep their actual subjects and statuses.
4. Recover every candidate through its direct governor. Use C.2.1 for the claim-bearing episteme, E.17.0 for a view with its own conformance relation, C.29 for a mathematical lens and correspondence, E.24.PUB for publication, and A.22 for a selected structure. A title, layout, Method label, carrier, or profile row supplies none of those results.
5. Complete the use-bounded selection. For the receiver and action, recover the complete selection basis defined in §4.2 and resolve any failed subject, reliance or receiving result at its owner. Use the direct exit when one owner already supplies this complete answer. Otherwise apply C.37; retain its basis once in the owning profile row only when later use needs it.
6. Compose the Method profile without flattening. Connect the completed rows to one MethodDescription or candidate account. Record cross-use correspondences, conflicting omissions, edition dependencies, and keep-separate decisions. Use §4.4 to construct a missing correspondence and follow its dependencies. Shared profile membership creates no composite Method, super-view, collection, selected structure, or new description edition.
7. Recover supporting subjects before relating their accounts. Preserve WorkPlan, Work, Method, result, and other subject statuses. Use A.15.6 when project, process, or case wording leaves the subject unclear. Accounts of one independently admitted Work retain that same subject; accounts of different subjects remain separate epistemes with only the needed correspondence relations. Each claimed view needs its own E.17.0 conformance result. Either arrangement may inform the same exact action under C.37; common subject identity alone neither permits co-use nor creates a multi-view family. Another action belongs in another row.
8. Resolve the live user-action question. Direct claim inspection or an already matching observation may suffice for the present profile. Select a new probe only when a usability, interpretation or loss uncertainty can change the decision and its full design, reader, interpretation and displaced-Work burden is warranted and obtainable. For a selected probe, the named receiver retrieves the claim, distinguishes status or alternatives, performs the bounded action and applies its stop; report the actual result, not observed success from a plan. Return a defect to ME.8, C.37, the direct subject or receiving-result owner, ME.10, or the owning Method decision.