MMP.Preface:3.6 - Use the model-forming result across the Suite

The Foundational Thinking Suite Reference explains the shared architecture and worked combinations. Mathematical Thinking constructs the objects and arguments a formulation needs. Physical or other subject methods supply the supported relations. Computational methods obtain the consequence, and the subject interpretation determines what that consequence lets the work do. Notational methods make these operations recoverable by their participants.

A particularly useful boundary concerns an unknown relation. MMP.11 can construct a family respecting supported conditions without selecting one fitted member. MMP.7 supplies a probabilistic recording law when that is the question, while C.16.IR can expose what a supplied indication or bound resolves. The appropriate next step can therefore be inference, a discriminating observation, an already sufficient bound, or action under the remaining uncertainty.

The Readme illustrates two further connections: carrying intervention consequences through a diagnostic report into a continuing instruction, and using cheaper components while retaining a sufficient combined answer. The needed intermediate result chooses the next method. General portfolio comparison and improvement remain with the existing FPF methods.