Source roles and scope of reliance
This framework is an original selective synthesis, not a replacement edition or complete translation of a Guide, standard or paper. Source accounts contribute to specific decisions; their complete procedures, derivations and jurisdictional provisions remain with the original works.
| Source return | Contribution used here | Limit that changes reliance |
|---|---|---|
| NASA, Reliability-Centered Maintenance Guide, 2008, task-selection discussion | Historical task-applicability and effectiveness reasoning in MNT.2. | This is not a current universal standard or a universal interval source. |
| Arts, Boute, Loeys and van Staden, Fifty years of maintenance optimization, 2025, EJOR 322(3), 725–739, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2024.07.002 | Coupled physical-failure and decision reasoning in MNT.2/3; support remains part of feasible response. | Models and the source’s data-oriented maturity account do not rank every maintenance practice. |
| Dadfarnia, Sharp and Herrmann, Comprehensive evaluations of condition monitoring-based technologies in industrial maintenance, 2025, JMS 82, 449–477 | Receiving-use consequences in MNT.4/13/14. | Heterogeneous study evidence does not supply a universal effectiveness estimate. |
| Orošnjak, Saretzky and Kedziora, Prescriptive Maintenance, 2025, Applied Sciences 15(15), 8507 | The condition-to-action question used in MNT.6. | The inspected abstract and synthesis do not warrant adopting a particular deployed algorithm. |
| Gan and colleagues, preparation-aware scheduling, 2026 issue, first online July 2025 | Preparation overlap as a candidate choice in MNT.5/7/15. | The inspected abstract’s scheduling model supplies neither plant-wide proof nor these case times. |
| Kasuya and Jin, flexible decision timing, 2026, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2026.112528 | Operating-rate and maintenance-timing alternatives in MNT.7/14. | The inspected abstract/introduction concerns modeled systems, not universal field transfer. |
| GFMAM, The Maintenance Framework, second edition, 2021, §6 | Breadth of task, support, information and programme concerns. | Its subject inventory is not copied as a compulsory Method sequence. |
| IAM, An Anatomy of Asset Management, version 4, 2024, §§7.5.9 and 7.7.5 | Maintained function and the relation to value-oriented decisions about an individual asset, an asset System or a portfolio. | Comparing continued use, renewal, replacement, repurposing or withdrawal by value, costs, risks and service effects is broader than MNT’s maintained-functioning result; portfolio scale is not compulsory. |
| OSHA, 29 CFR 1910.147 | A bounded example of operative energy-control, verification and restoration requirements. | Actual use requires the applicable current rules, scope and equipment procedure. |
| EASA, September 2025 Part-145 guidance, 145.A.50 and GM1 145.A.50(a) | Distinguishing specified maintenance certification from a broader use claim in MNT.11. | This is a dated illustration; the edition notice identifies missing later requirements. |
| CASA, maintenance-activities risk profile: Fatigue, 24 April 2026 | A human-performance counterexample to attention-only responses in MNT.9/16. | An aviation account does not supply a universal threshold or quantified causal effect. |
Use SYSE.12 for enabling-platform questions and SYSE.13 for configuration. The relevant OPS results support management of maintenance Work and provision.
For related explanations across the engineering languages, use the Engineering DPF Suite Reference. Direct governing Methods remain with FPF and the named DPF patterns; a source catalogue is a finding aid rather than independent confirmation of their claims.