NSTD.6:5.3 - Before and after evaluation repair

Before evaluation statement:

The narrative is strong because readers liked it and remembered the main point.

Failure: engagement and memory are treated as total quality. Source recovery, relation strength, owner routing, and use boundary are absent.

After evaluation statement:

For the declared onboarding use, the illustrative recovery result is that learners can reconstruct the pattern-use route; a numerical amount needs a specified relation set, conditions and evidence. Source-return readiness receives value 3 because two slogans lack pattern-body refs, and engagement boundary receives value 4 because the failure story is marked as archetypal. The first repair is to add source-return refs for the slogans before changing style.

Now E.23 has a concrete changed slice: add two source-return refs and re-evaluate source-return readiness. Revisit the amount only if the changed access or explanation can change structural recovery. An earlier amount label is reusable only through its recoverable selection, scale, conditions and evidence; an unsupported 4 does not become 4/5.