Jump to text
On this page
Copy and source
Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-14 19:58:00 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-14 19:58:38 UTC · last check 2026-10-15 00:05:10 UTC

NSTD.Reference:11 - Working meanings and direct source returns

These terms help distinguish questions that occur in narrative work. A local field name does not create a new Core kind. Use the cited definition when the particular claim needs its precision.

TermMeaning in this DPFWhen a related method is needed
source basis; admitted source basisMaterial used for the account: a formal text, event record, story premise, canon, architecture description or another relevant source. “Admitted” adds a receiving-use condition only when one is specified.Compare ordinary sources directly. Use G.2 for SoTA synthesis, A.10 for an evidence claim or E.17.EFP for a source-based explanation.
selected source structureThe relations or distinctions selected for the narrative.A.6.3.NAR relates the source to the account; A.22 helps describe structure, C.2.8 its recovery by a reader, and C.33 architecture-description adequacy.
source-structure selection rationaleWhy those relations matter for the reader’s use.NSTD.1 revises selection and purpose together.
source temporal postureWhether the account concerns past events, a live situation, a plan, prospective fiction or a combination.NSTD.1 keeps observation, inference and invention distinguishable when their difference matters.
rendering mediation modeWhether the narrative draws directly on source structure, through an architecture description, or both.Use architecture methods only for the architecture contribution actually involved.
architecture-mediated narrativization routeNarrative construction that uses an architecture description, view, decision or account of actual structure as a source.C.30/C.32 govern the relevant architecture work; NSTD.1/.2 govern selection and presentation.
rendering Work roleThe writing, teaching, commentary or other contribution sought in the task.A precise actual-Work claim separately identifies the System, applicable role assignment and occurrence through A.13 and A.15.1. The task description alone asserts no occurrence.
reader or listener roleThe receiver’s working position and intended use.NSTD.1/.6 use it to select material and judge the account; it does not establish actual comprehension.
reader-interest or use hypothesisA tentative account of what the reader wants to understand, remember or do.A comparison or reader response through NSTD.5/.6 may change that hypothesis.
narrative renderingThe resulting narrative account; where relevant, distinguish it from the construction relation and the file or other publication form.A.6.3.NAR defines the construction; E.17 addresses publication form.
narrative purposeThe intended contribution to the reader’s use, including an expressive aim.NSTD.1 relates it to the selected material.
ordering ruleThe way selected material is presented in sequence.NSTD.2 distinguishes presentation order from event time, proof dependency and required work order.
event modelA reader’s account of events, states and their connections.NSTD.3 repairs those connections; use C.28 when a causal claim itself requires causal analysis.
viewpointThe position from which the account presents its material.NSTD.4 compares what this reveals and hides.
focalized objectThe person, object, relation or situation made salient by the chosen viewpoint.NSTD.4 separates salience from an attribution of action or responsibility.
voiceHow the narrator speaks: stance, distance, confidence and relation to the events.NSTD.4 checks a consequential mismatch between voice and what is known.
protagonistA central participant or focus of the narrative.Real responsibility or capability, when claimed, requires its own grounds.
actantA function in a narrative relation or plot.Distinguish it from a real System’s local system-role kind or assignment under A.2/A.2.1.
agency; personificationAgency concerns action; personification presents something through humanlike properties.Use A.13 for a precise agency claim and NSTD.4 to repair misleading attribution.
engagement effectA change in attention, motivation, immersion, memorability or willingness to continue.NSTD.5/.6 distinguish these effects from understanding and source fidelity.
persuasion boundaryA condition on the intended influence or choice the account supports.D.1–D.5 help resolve actual value, affected-party or harm conflicts.
generated source planA plan of selected material, relations and constraints supplied to a generator.NSTD.7 compares it with the source and draft. G.2 concerns SoTA synthesis; C.35 concerns results entering architecture work.
plot or event planA proposed arrangement of fictional or narrated events.NSTD.2/.7 compare the plan and draft; a plan is not evidence that events occurred.
schema constraintA formal or informal rule imposed on generated output.NSTD.7 distinguishes compliance with that rule from semantic adequacy or successful execution.
generation methodThe procedure used to produce a draft.NSTD.7 guides its use; a product can be inspected even when its production history is unknown.
repair loopRepeated changes evaluated against the intended improvement.E.22 frames an unresolved improvement question; E.23 uses results such as NSTD.6 to choose and reassess changes.
learning narrative routeAn arrangement of material and learner activities intended to develop a capability.NSTD.8 supplies needed support at each use; E.17 and E.17.AUD address the teaching publication.
learner reconstruction taskA task asking a learner to recover or use selected relations.NSTD.8/.6 distinguish task performance, assistance and the wider learning claim.
narrative rendering epiplexityIn NSTD.6, the reader-relative recovery of selected structure, using C.2.8.Qualify the observer, form, conditions and evidence. A qualitative comparison does not supply a bit estimate, general learning result or architecture-quality result.
narrative quality characteristicOne question about a narrative version for a declared use.A.19.ECS, C.16 and NSTD.6 distinguish the characteristic, scale, observation and result.
narrative language-state facet profileA description of articulation, closure, anchoring, representation and their relevant thresholds.Use C.2.LS and C.2.4–C.2.7 when one of those distinctions changes the work.
pre-articulation narrative cueAn image, tension, mismatch or hint worth retaining before a clear narrative claim or route exists.A.16.1 supports exploration without prematurely fixing a route.
preconceptual narrative fit signalFelt rightness or artistic pull before a defined quality comparison.C.16.Q distinguishes this signal from a characteristic value; A.16.1 can preserve it as a cue.
coarsened narrative renderingA simplified or restricted account that omits distinctions from its source.A.6.3.CSC identifies the consequences for use and needed source returns.
explanation-facing narrative renderingA narrative used to help a reader understand a source.E.17.EFP distinguishes its explanatory relation; A.6.3.NAR applies when narrative order is part of the construction.
narrative precision restorationResolving wording whose ambiguity changes the claim or action.Use E.10, A.6.P, C.16.Q or C.2.P for the specific unresolved meaning.
artistic or literary rendering modeA choice of voice, tone, genre, scene or technique for an expressive or other reader aim.NSTD.4/.5 guide the choice; NSTD.6 assesses it for that aim without treating artistic effect as factual support.