NSTD.Reference:11 - Working meanings and direct source returns
These terms help distinguish questions that occur in narrative work. A local field name does not create a new Core kind. Use the cited definition when the particular claim needs its precision.
| Term | Meaning in this DPF | When a related method is needed |
|---|---|---|
| source basis; admitted source basis | Material used for the account: a formal text, event record, story premise, canon, architecture description or another relevant source. “Admitted” adds a receiving-use condition only when one is specified. | Compare ordinary sources directly. Use G.2 for SoTA synthesis, A.10 for an evidence claim or E.17.EFP for a source-based explanation. |
| selected source structure | The relations or distinctions selected for the narrative. | A.6.3.NAR relates the source to the account; A.22 helps describe structure, C.2.8 its recovery by a reader, and C.33 architecture-description adequacy. |
| source-structure selection rationale | Why those relations matter for the reader’s use. | NSTD.1 revises selection and purpose together. |
| source temporal posture | Whether the account concerns past events, a live situation, a plan, prospective fiction or a combination. | NSTD.1 keeps observation, inference and invention distinguishable when their difference matters. |
| rendering mediation mode | Whether the narrative draws directly on source structure, through an architecture description, or both. | Use architecture methods only for the architecture contribution actually involved. |
| architecture-mediated narrativization route | Narrative construction that uses an architecture description, view, decision or account of actual structure as a source. | C.30/C.32 govern the relevant architecture work; NSTD.1/.2 govern selection and presentation. |
| rendering Work role | The writing, teaching, commentary or other contribution sought in the task. | A precise actual-Work claim separately identifies the System, applicable role assignment and occurrence through A.13 and A.15.1. The task description alone asserts no occurrence. |
| reader or listener role | The receiver’s working position and intended use. | NSTD.1/.6 use it to select material and judge the account; it does not establish actual comprehension. |
| reader-interest or use hypothesis | A tentative account of what the reader wants to understand, remember or do. | A comparison or reader response through NSTD.5/.6 may change that hypothesis. |
| narrative rendering | The resulting narrative account; where relevant, distinguish it from the construction relation and the file or other publication form. | A.6.3.NAR defines the construction; E.17 addresses publication form. |
| narrative purpose | The intended contribution to the reader’s use, including an expressive aim. | NSTD.1 relates it to the selected material. |
| ordering rule | The way selected material is presented in sequence. | NSTD.2 distinguishes presentation order from event time, proof dependency and required work order. |
| event model | A reader’s account of events, states and their connections. | NSTD.3 repairs those connections; use C.28 when a causal claim itself requires causal analysis. |
| viewpoint | The position from which the account presents its material. | NSTD.4 compares what this reveals and hides. |
| focalized object | The person, object, relation or situation made salient by the chosen viewpoint. | NSTD.4 separates salience from an attribution of action or responsibility. |
| voice | How the narrator speaks: stance, distance, confidence and relation to the events. | NSTD.4 checks a consequential mismatch between voice and what is known. |
| protagonist | A central participant or focus of the narrative. | Real responsibility or capability, when claimed, requires its own grounds. |
| actant | A function in a narrative relation or plot. | Distinguish it from a real System’s local system-role kind or assignment under A.2/A.2.1. |
| agency; personification | Agency concerns action; personification presents something through humanlike properties. | Use A.13 for a precise agency claim and NSTD.4 to repair misleading attribution. |
| engagement effect | A change in attention, motivation, immersion, memorability or willingness to continue. | NSTD.5/.6 distinguish these effects from understanding and source fidelity. |
| persuasion boundary | A condition on the intended influence or choice the account supports. | D.1–D.5 help resolve actual value, affected-party or harm conflicts. |
| generated source plan | A plan of selected material, relations and constraints supplied to a generator. | NSTD.7 compares it with the source and draft. G.2 concerns SoTA synthesis; C.35 concerns results entering architecture work. |
| plot or event plan | A proposed arrangement of fictional or narrated events. | NSTD.2/.7 compare the plan and draft; a plan is not evidence that events occurred. |
| schema constraint | A formal or informal rule imposed on generated output. | NSTD.7 distinguishes compliance with that rule from semantic adequacy or successful execution. |
| generation method | The procedure used to produce a draft. | NSTD.7 guides its use; a product can be inspected even when its production history is unknown. |
| repair loop | Repeated changes evaluated against the intended improvement. | E.22 frames an unresolved improvement question; E.23 uses results such as NSTD.6 to choose and reassess changes. |
| learning narrative route | An arrangement of material and learner activities intended to develop a capability. | NSTD.8 supplies needed support at each use; E.17 and E.17.AUD address the teaching publication. |
| learner reconstruction task | A task asking a learner to recover or use selected relations. | NSTD.8/.6 distinguish task performance, assistance and the wider learning claim. |
| narrative rendering epiplexity | In NSTD.6, the reader-relative recovery of selected structure, using C.2.8. | Qualify the observer, form, conditions and evidence. A qualitative comparison does not supply a bit estimate, general learning result or architecture-quality result. |
| narrative quality characteristic | One question about a narrative version for a declared use. | A.19.ECS, C.16 and NSTD.6 distinguish the characteristic, scale, observation and result. |
| narrative language-state facet profile | A description of articulation, closure, anchoring, representation and their relevant thresholds. | Use C.2.LS and C.2.4–C.2.7 when one of those distinctions changes the work. |
| pre-articulation narrative cue | An image, tension, mismatch or hint worth retaining before a clear narrative claim or route exists. | A.16.1 supports exploration without prematurely fixing a route. |
| preconceptual narrative fit signal | Felt rightness or artistic pull before a defined quality comparison. | C.16.Q distinguishes this signal from a characteristic value; A.16.1 can preserve it as a cue. |
| coarsened narrative rendering | A simplified or restricted account that omits distinctions from its source. | A.6.3.CSC identifies the consequences for use and needed source returns. |
| explanation-facing narrative rendering | A narrative used to help a reader understand a source. | E.17.EFP distinguishes its explanatory relation; A.6.3.NAR applies when narrative order is part of the construction. |
| narrative precision restoration | Resolving wording whose ambiguity changes the claim or action. | Use E.10, A.6.P, C.16.Q or C.2.P for the specific unresolved meaning. |
| artistic or literary rendering mode | A choice of voice, tone, genre, scene or technique for an expressive or other reader aim. | NSTD.4/.5 guide the choice; NSTD.6 assesses it for that aim without treating artistic effect as factual support. |