OCE.4:11.2 - Source Contributions and Boundaries
| Source line | Retained contribution | Use boundary |
|---|---|---|
Current FPF A.22, C.30, C.30.AD, C.32, and C.32.PAD | Selected structures, actual versus modal architecture, candidate synthesis, descriptions, and decisions remain separate. | Use these distinctions to qualify the local design; derive specialization boundaries and contribution content from the organization’s working problem. |
| Joseph and Sengul, current organization-design review | Contemporary organization design uses complementary configuration, control, channelization, and coordination approaches; one representation or feature does not cover the field. | The review organizes research rather than selecting a local organization, relation predicate, or architecture decision. |
| Albert, organization-structure perspectives | Activity arrangement, decision representation, and legal-entity perspectives can expose different design consequences. | Select the local organization and any additional perspective needed for its design question. |
| Grote et al., contribution-based engineering role modeling | Required contributions and stakeholder evidence can expose organization-specific contribution bundles and gaps. | The evidence covers three industrial cases and one workshop/clustering Method. Test transfer beyond those cases; decide local positions and assignments separately. |
| Fraccaroli, Zaniboni, and Truxillo, work-design review | Work characteristics, technology, diversity, and affected-person outcomes belong in design. | Supply the target organization and authority basis locally, and select a Method suited to its design problem. |
| Schulze-Meeßen and Hamborg, participatory work-design representations | Participant-facing representations can improve recognition and design knowledge. | Use representations to elicit design knowledge; test actual relations, authority, capability, and effects with the evidence appropriate to each claim. |
Reopen when representative use exposes a recurring contribution crossing the result cannot express, a serious alternative produces the same decision with less modeling burden, or a direct source changes the specialization or participant action.