OCE.8:4.2 - Generate Serious Arrangement Families
| Arrangement family | Complete the candidate with | Return without overclaim |
|---|---|---|
| develop a current holder or admitted collective | Exact holder System, target Work family, current capability envelope and evidence, limiting contribution, intervention and provider if any, protected conditions, and representative transfer check. | E.23.CDI and the direct human, AI, robotic, organizational, or domain development Method own development and transfer. Check transfer to the target Work separately from completion of training, tuning, calibration, tooling, or provider delivery. |
| recruit or assign another internal holder | Required contribution, candidate holder kind and actual System when known, capability fit, exact assignment species, authority, resource and access needs, integration Work, continuity, substitution, and evidence. | OCE.5 and OCE.6 own positions, obtaining assignments, and enabling relations. Assess capability and verify assignment effectivity separately from recruitment and titles. |
| obtain a provider contribution | Provider System, bounded Work/result/service/support, capability evidence, receiving acceptance, retained or supplied authority, information and asset custody, access, dependency, monitoring, failure return, continuity, recovery, substitution, and exit. | Procurement, contract, finance, legal, privacy, security, safety, Administration, and provider practices retain their direct results. A promise is not provision; provider success is not receiving-organization capability. |
| change a Method, contribution interface, or platform/support arrangement | Exact limiting result, Method or MethodDescription, direct contribution/interface relation, supporting System, changed burden, migration, trial, recovery, and evidence that the change addresses the bottleneck. | OCE.4, OCE.7, OCE.15, Method Engineering, Systems Engineering, Administration, Operations, or the direct platform owner retains the changed object and result. Test whether the realized change improves the named bottleneck. |
| allocate bounded Work across human, AI, robotic, provider, or hybrid Systems | Work status; separately identified performers, supports, and providers; capability evidence; assignments and permissions; authority and decision points; interfaces and coordination; control, supervision, override, escalation, recovery; and representative probe evidence. | A.15.8 owns a configuration/recovery probe only after its exact input exists. A.13 and A.15.1 own actual performers and Work. Direct AI, robotics, human-factors, safety, and domain Methods own mechanisms and thresholds. |
The obtaining baseline and these five families are generation aids, not six automatic options. One whole arrangement may combine several families. A failing baseline remains comparison evidence outside the target-result OptionSet; a partial intervention remains a component until the other required relations and conditions are supplied.