PSD.10:4.5 - Form a discriminating question

Write the question in terms of its possible consequences for the current return:

For this subject and horizon, establish whether this premise lies inside the region supporting alternative A, outside it, or remains unresolved; state the evidence and limits needed for that use.

The requested result may concern eligibility rather than ranking. It may also show that no available alternative works, that a different formulation is needed, or that only a reversible analytical use is supported.

Name a feasible observation, calculation, interpretation, or comparison that might answer the question, its supplying practice, and the relevant time or access limit. If no feasible inquiry can answer before the decision window closes, say so. Do not promise that more data will settle structural ignorance.

This pattern identifies decision-linked questions. PSD.12 can later examine reversals and information priorities; C.11 or the direct choice owner decides whether an actual next probe is worth its cost and authorized. A question with high uncertainty is not automatically the best probe.