fpf.tools
Library / Problem Structuring and Decision Support Principles Framework
Jump to passage
In this reading
Source · lines 2747–2756

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 05:29:54 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 05:30:57 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 06:35:10 UTC

PSD.12:12 - Relations

  • PSD.11 may supply the consequence comparison and its evidence for the same configuration and horizon. Evidence enables this test but does not establish its result.
  • PSD.13 may consume robust regions, reversals, and information priorities as evidence for its recommendation. This neither entails the recommendation nor transfers the later choice authority.
  • A.10 governs bounded evidence reliance; direct domain and modeling practices govern the validity of claims, models, ranges, and tests. Changed actual source uses receive their direct revalidation rather than a blanket robustness assertion.
  • C.16 governs quantities, scales and response comparability; C.29 governs a needed mathematical representation and its correspondence limits. Neither supplies domain validation merely through the calculation.
  • C.11.CRC compares a proposed finite change to the arrangement, including the feasibility and burden of maintaining a protection. A sensitivity result does not itself change that arrangement.
  • C.11 governs an actual local choice and the worth of another probe. Information priority, probe selection, WorkPlan, performed inquiry, and observed effect remain distinct results.
  • Candidate formation, value elicitation, model repair, and follow-up remain their own questions when the test exposes a gap there. Missing or incompatible inputs require a qualified direct result or an exact stop, not an invented prerequisite lifecycle.