PSD.13:7 - Conformance Checklist
Recognition asks whether recommendation composition is the missing result: a named recipient needs an answer that combines qualified premises, and the account can change their next consideration. A short supported answer with its necessary limit can close a small use; a selected request or exact blocker can also be useful.
Assurance asks whether this particular disposition is warranted for its intended reliance. Consequential uses add the direct domain’s evidence, competence, independence, consent, safety, security, institutional and validation conditions; the size of the account does not lower them.
| Check | Sufficient answer |
|---|---|
| Receiving use | Recipient, subject, horizon, recommending performer, receiving decision/Work and separate choice boundary are recoverable. |
| Premise fit | Every decision-bearing input fits its actual configuration, window and use, or its gap and consequence are explicit. |
| Candidate and comparison coverage | The live set, compared subset, retained alternatives, exclusions, scheme and material reversals are visible. |
| Warrant | The inference supports the stated disposition without inventing preferences, probabilities, authority or supplier results. |
| Conditions and dissent | Material protection, disagreement, evidence loss and professional restrictions survive the return. |
| Use and reconsideration | The recipient can find the next use and exact reason to reconsider; required observation is feasible or named as a limit. |
| Result boundaries | Recommendation, communication, later choice, WorkPlan, implementation and effect have not been substituted for one another. |
If one check fails, repair or narrow the affected claim or return the honest stop. Request a missing result only when its obtainable contribution warrants acquisition. Do not erase independently usable content to make the account look uniform.