PSD.14:5.2 - One changed AI configuration need not restart all advice
For a ninety-day reliability question, a committee received advice to consider a bounded mixed human–AI probe while retaining internal development. Assume the advice relied on qualified whole-arrangement, security and evaluation results for configuration A. A separate supplied decision shows that the committee authorized only a bounded probe under specified continuity and oversight conditions.
The follow-up designer compares a monthly report, an automated outcome stream without specialist interpretation, and configuration-change notification combined with a targeted probe-evidence review. The monthly option is too slow for the reversible-probe decision window. The stream alone cannot establish that a new scaffold or tool environment is covered by the previous evaluation. The combined option is selected only after the configuration owner, evaluation supplier, adviser and committee have the necessary notification, access, interpretation and receiving arrangements.
Now a configuration-change notice identifies B. That notice is evidence of a changed object, not evidence of B’s quality. The probe observation covers B, while the relied-on evaluation still covers A. The response is deliberately split:
| Inspected use | Current consequence |
|---|---|
| Internal-development claim whose premises did not use A’s evaluation or the changed allocation | Remains usable for its named service and horizon. |
| Earlier mixed-arrangement recommendation for A | Retained as the earlier conditional result; it is not qualification of B. |
| Advice to extend the probe or deploy B | Blocked pending the exact B evaluation, security and allocation premises that can change that advice. |
| Need for renewed comparison | Reopen only the suppliers and comparison claims that actually use the changed configuration; compose a later recommendation when their qualified returns support one. |
The configuration notice does not choose a fallback, stop a service or revoke a permission. If an existing authorized continuity or safety rule governs B, its competent owner applies it separately; otherwise the choice or authority gap is returned promptly. The adviser must not keep an apparently positive recommendation by treating silence from the evaluation supplier as approval.
The same locality works with a human development premise. If an employee’s available practice time changes, requalify the affected intervention and transfer claim rather than rewriting unrelated organization or AI evidence. Applicable client-contact conditions may require a conversation, but that conversation does not itself establish transfer or consent to a different intervention.