PSD.14:7 - Conformance Checklist

Recognition asks whether an observation or changed premise can alter current decision support and whether the path to a useful return is missing. One existing adequate result or one clearly scoped gap can close a small case.

Assurance asks whether this arrangement can obtain and qualify the needed evidence in time, and whether the actual current return follows from it. Consequential uses require their direct observation, validation, competence, independence, protection and authority conditions. A prospective walkthrough tests design only; it does not replace evidence from enactment.

Check	Sufficient answer
Distinct results	Recommendation, later authorized decision, intended work, implementation and observation are separately established or explicitly unknown.
Material observation	Each selected observation can change a named premise, claim, alternative, condition or boundary; any threshold has a qualified meaning.
Design choice	Feasible arrangements were compared by coverage, delay, burden and receiving use; a PSD.16 constraint did not preselect the answer.
Viability	Observation, interpretation and return have the necessary performers, access, resources, timing, protection and failure route.
Current evidence	The actual evidence fits its subject, configuration, interval and intended use; absence or silence is not favourable evidence.
Local consequence	Unchanged, narrowed, blocked, reopened-contributor and later-recommendation conclusions name their exact affected scopes and gaps.
Authority and closure	Operational change and recipient choice retain their direct authority; the follow-up return has a bounded continuation or end condition.